1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

The trades

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by magnus, Apr 30, 2009.

Which was the better value?

  1. 2008: 19 for 2009 first, 2008 2nd, 2008 4th

    10 vote(s)
    41.7%

  2. 2009: 43 and 111 for 2010 first

    14 vote(s)
    58.3%
Page 1 of 3
  1. Apr 30, 2009 at 8:35 AM #1
    magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    Which was better value directly after it was made?
     
  2. Apr 30, 2009 at 9:12 AM #2
    Internet Explorer

    Internet Explorer Full Access Member

    Posts:
    413
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    The 2010 first will be #32 :bigsquaregrin: :whistling:

    We only move back 11 slots, get this pick a year early AND get an extra 4th this year


    Going back to what i was doing now. :bong_hit:
     
  3. Apr 30, 2009 at 10:04 AM #3
    yhatemetoo

    yhatemetoo Full Access Member

    Posts:
    494
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 27, 2008
    Location:
    NC
    the 2010 coudle be a pick between 8 and 15
     
  4. Apr 30, 2009 at 10:22 AM #4
    presidence99

    presidence99 es lo que hay.

    Posts:
    16,492
    Likes Received:
    2,680
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    1 and 32.
     
  5. Apr 30, 2009 at 12:45 PM #5
    yhatemetoo

    yhatemetoo Full Access Member

    Posts:
    494
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 27, 2008
    Location:
    NC

    captain obvious, i meant based on our finish
     
  6. Apr 30, 2009 at 2:21 PM #6
    hasbeen99

    hasbeen99 Fighting the stereotype

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Clovis, CA
    The details for the 2008 trade:

    CAR receives pick #19
    PHI receives picks #43, #109, and #28 in 2009


    The details for the 2009 trade:

    CAR receives picks #43 and #111
    SF receives 2010 1st rnd pick


    That being the case, my opinion is that assuming Brown and Martin are reasonably close to meeting expecations, this year's trade had way more value. It's not even close, really.
     
  7. Apr 30, 2009 at 2:33 PM #7
    presidence99

    presidence99 es lo que hay.

    Posts:
    16,492
    Likes Received:
    2,680
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Me too.
     
  8. Apr 30, 2009 at 4:02 PM #8
    Smoke Screen

    Smoke Screen Fire Ron Rivera's Dumbass

    Posts:
    2,645
    Likes Received:
    93
    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    This years was better value; whether it works out as well as last years remains to be seen. Hindsight on last year I wouldn't change a thing, it worked out pretty damn well.
     
  9. Apr 30, 2009 at 4:16 PM #9
    Bob Johnson

    Bob Johnson Full Access Member

    Posts:
    384
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Location:
    chillaxville
    If it works out right and Carolina finishes in the playoffs again, then this years deal may have been better, but maybe not.

    Picking 19th overall was a huge value over the 28th pick this year. If Carolina finishes this year in the playoffs then the 43rd pick may not be as big of a deal, but if Carolina has a top 15 pick, then we basically gave a up a SOLID starter next year for what may be a starter this year at 43rd and I don't believe we had to do that to get the 43rd pick.
     
  10. Apr 30, 2009 at 4:21 PM #10
    Thelt

    Thelt Full Access Member

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    29,797
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Location:
    To the right
    My biggest issue with last year's draft was the fact that they took a running back with their first round pick when we already had DW. A back up for DW did not seem important enough to me to merit a first round pick. If we had not did that we could have taken Otah with our existing first rounder. That would have left us with a second round pick last year and our first this year.

    Stewart turned out to be a good player so I do not have much issue with it now but at the time I thought it was a mistake.

    This year we filled a need by trading. I have no problem with it. If we had a first round pick this year and had used it for a position where we are already solid like linebacker then I would have a problem with trading to get Brown.
     
Page 1 of 3

Share This Page