1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Delhomme

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by meatpile, Sep 10, 2003.

  1. UNCdubya

    UNCdubya Full Access Member

    Age:
    47
    Posts:
    2,615
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    Location:
    Charlotte
    you are a crack whore arent you, i didnt mean to insult you.
     
  2. chipshotx

    chipshotx Full Access Member

    Posts:
    13,048
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    Location:
    Gondwanaland
    I honestly don't think I know a single person in reality who likes delhomme and that is the truth. I don't know how many times I heard people in green bay say that the paanthers would be great if we had a qb
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2008
  3. magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    I know plenty. Odd, the person who doesn't have a negative outlook has a...less negative outlook than the person with the negative outlook?

    The argument you've used here for years that other teams' fans aren't enamored with Delhomme has never put much concern into me.
     
  4. gottalaff

    gottalaff Smartass

    Posts:
    41,027
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Right behind you
    Well that validates everything.
     
  5. Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    It always has been. There are plenty of people who I argue with incessantly but I don't despise them the way that I despise you. You're free to disagree with my judgment, but I do despise you specifically because I think you're a mind wasted on bias and dishonesty. It drives me nuts.
    Own up to what? The only "statistic" you posted was that bit about Jake being 9th in QB rating before the bye. That's not anything that supports a notion that Jake is special. That's like saying that Jake is 6'2" and pretending that it somehow is evidence that Jake is special. Yes, it is a fact, but it's not persuasive in any sense.
    Most people used to find him to be an asset. Few people defend him anymore.
     
  6. chipshotx

    chipshotx Full Access Member

    Posts:
    13,048
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    Location:
    Gondwanaland
    it's called perspective

    He's not very good. It pretty obvious to every other person who watches football. You aren't the only one who watches.
     
  7. Abusive

    Abusive Fuck yo blanket

    Posts:
    11,183
    Likes Received:
    1,542
    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Location:
    No.
    Let me settle this argument.

    Jake is not accurate. Not on any level. He wins a lot of games, and does some of it on his own. But make no mistake--from an accuracy perspective, he's weak, and until that is addressed with this team, we will have some struggles.

    Ok, so, now that we settled that, let's all enjoy this:

     
  8. Brick Hardwick

    Brick Hardwick Senior Member

    Posts:
    324
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    ? wheres colon?
     
  9. gottalaff

    gottalaff Smartass

    Posts:
    41,027
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Right behind you
    researching.... :lmao:
     
  10. magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    I think this is just peachy. Any time you're willing to admit bias in a thread where you blast anyone as biased, well, it warms my heart.

    that'll work as owning up, I guess.


    it was a statement against him being "not good enough to start". 9th in the league in QB rating would generally be "good enough to start" just as his 106 home QB rating would probably be "good enough to start".
    If it were a statement someone else made, and you weren't so vehemently against that player, you'd be dressing them down. Jake's good enough to start and you know it.
     

Share This Page