1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Wachovia

Discussion in 'Money & Finance Forum' started by LRBaseballer, Sep 29, 2008.

  1. chipshotx

    chipshotx Full Access Member

    Posts:
    13,048
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    Location:
    Gondwanaland

    ~20% of what you currently have
     
  2. tonync55

    tonync55 Full Access Member

    Posts:
    9,854
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2004
    Location:
    Western North Carolina
    How does this compare to the alternative,Citicorp?
     
  3. wolfpac

    wolfpac Full Access Member

    Posts:
    1,014
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 27, 2003
    Yep, that is why I was thinking it would be better for Charlotte.

    BTW, great for taxpayers as well which makes me happy. So far, the details indicate no gov't presence in this deal.
     
  4. wolfpac

    wolfpac Full Access Member

    Posts:
    1,014
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 27, 2003
    One other piece that was interesting to me is that since Wells is a SF bank, they would understand the California Real Estate Market better than us here in Charlotte. They may have a better grasp on how to handle all those stupid Pick-A-Payment loans than a Citi would.
     
  5. VA49er

    VA49er Full Access Member

    Posts:
    22,561
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2003
    Maybe. Golden West was a California institution and they made the loans in the first place. Wells is pretty conservative and this merger is outside it's normal operating procedure. It'll be interesting to see how Wells handles the WB option ARM portfolio. Remember, Wells initially pulled out of the WB negotiations because it wasn't comfortable with WB's loan portfolio. Not sure what made Wells change its mind.
     
  6. curly

    curly Full Access Member

    Posts:
    1,267
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2003
    I would think the drop in price had something to to with it
     
  7. VA49er

    VA49er Full Access Member

    Posts:
    22,561
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2003
    There's probably more to it than that. Drop in price didn't really alleviate all asset quality concerns I would imagine. Wells is conservative by nature and this is a leap for them. Maybe they just decided the risk of not buying WB was greater than the risk of buying WB.
     
  8. Bootay

    Bootay Poppycock

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    2,246
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    Location:
    Rangoon
    Wells is much better for CLT - Charlotte HQ stays intact, investment bankers stay, and Wells is a better run company that matches well with Wachovia culture (slow moving, conservative) so that should help keep more people from bailing.

    Wells is much better for WB stock holders, as the price jump demonstrated today. The valuation is higher directly, instead of the crazy unknowns of the Citi deal.

    Wells did it partially because they knew it was their best chance to get what they've wanted forever, bigger branch presence in the east and specificaly SE, and WB is the crown jewel of that market. And on Tuesday, the IRS rules around mortgage losses and such changed, so the deal all of a sudden became MUCH more attractive for them.

    Citi was forced on WB, Wells and WB is a natural fit. Hopefully there'll end up being some sort of bidding war, there are rumors of a third bank entering the fray (that Spanish bank), but I think this is it. A lot of people got REALLY hosed on monday, but I know some people that went all in Monday-Wednesday and have made a KILLING. I'm just praying for $10/shr :).
     
  9. tonync55

    tonync55 Full Access Member

    Posts:
    9,854
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2004
    Location:
    Western North Carolina
    Judge blocks Wells Fargo-Wachovia deal

    (CNN) -- A judge has temporarily blocked Wells Fargo's acquisition of Wachovia, according to a news release by Citigroup, which previously had a deal with Wachovia.:thumbsdown:

    Citigroup and Wells Fargo both say they have a deal in place to take over banking giant Wachovia.

    New York State Supreme Court Justice Charles Ramos issued the order, saying that Citigroup and Wachovia must appear before him on Friday, the news release said.

    Citigroup has been pressing Wachovia and Wells Fargo to abandon their merger plans, arguing that it had entered into an exclusivity agreement with Wachovia.:deal:

    In a deal struck with the assistance of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC):wine: on Monday, Citigroup had offered to take over the Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank for $2.2 billion. However, four days later, Wells Fargo said it was buying Wachovia for $14.8 billion.
     
  10. Bootay

    Bootay Poppycock

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    2,246
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    Location:
    Rangoon
    no big surprise there. Wachovia and Wells Fargo had been in discussions for a long time, and the citi agreement prevents NEW stuff only (if Wachovia solicited WF to come bid again, that would be a problem, but if Wells offered a new deal and Wachovia accepted, that was not prohibitied). It won't stand up.
     

Share This Page