Bears matchup = Fox ball

I noticed you missed commenting on another part of my post.

A rating of 76 is still "clearly" better then a rating of 71, huh?

We all agree Orton sucks.. yet you have to take away an INT from Jakes stats to barely push him above Ortons rating.. thats quality QB play right there. "Our QB, if you take away an INT is 5 QB rating points above the guy that sucks!". Well, whatever makes you feel good I guess.

So what does the week two win over the Bears Super Bowl ring look like?

 

It looks like a scoreboard reading 20-17.

 

BTW fucktard.. last I checked, the NFL season was more then 2 weeks long, I dont think anyone has been eliminated from playoff contention yet.. despite what your crystal ball says.

But just for you, I will be around to remind you how wrong you are all season!

Shithead!

 

While that's very true, you must not have seen the game last week. If the Bears 'dominated' us yesterday (lol) then there is no word in the english language suitable for the ass-kicking we gave the Chargers last week.

3 field goals and a shitty 4th and goal play from the 1 could easily have been 21-28 points. That game should never have come down to the last play. But at least we made the play when it mattered.

Just like yesterday.

Now go home and get your fucking shinebox.

 

You must be blind. I was 30 rows up in the 500 section and it was clear that at least one Bear hit him late if not two.

 

Not to be a spell nazi, but there is a big difference between 'then' and 'than', and 'then' is not universal for 'than'. Especially when it's done over and over and over, not like it's a typo.

Anyway, kiawhathtefukever musta had a kid when he was twelve, because he must not be more than thirteen now.

It's purty fukin stoopid sombody's old enough to be sombody's 'daddy', and yet frequent another teams message board such as kiawhathtefukeverdaddy did this past week, in the way he has, and yet is still here after his team were losers yesterday. What a loser. What a pisspoor, childish little fuktard loser.

If he's a typical Bear fan, I now see why Mike has dissed them like he has. They must be very very pitiful. They diserve no respect at all.

 

Even in the first half that was more about the Panthers fucking up than Chicago being dominating. Forte had some good runs and the Bears' interior line handled our DTs, but aside from that I can't remember Chicago making a lot of plays.

 

Did you happen to see the first half stats?

Straight from NFL.com, here is the Panthers first half drives:

1st Quarter
Start Time Time Poss Drive Began # of Plays Net Yards Result
15:00 2:00 CAR 20 3 3 Blocked Punt
13:00 4:22 CAR 35 6 -3 Punt
03:36 1:36 CAR 44 3 0 Punt

2nd Quarter
Start Time Time Poss Drive Began # of Plays Net Yards Result
09:09 3:21 CAR 19 5 20 Punt
04:31 2:29 CHI 47 3 -7 Punt
01:27 1:15 CHI 23 4 4 Field Goal

So, the Panthers had a TOTAL of 17 yards of offense in the first half (with the ONLY points coming off a 4 yard "drive" that started at the Bears 23 at the end of the half.

Meanwhile the Bears had 135 yards of offense in the first half... but I guess thats pretty close to 17 yards in your mind, huh?

 

The blocked punt was making a play, but that was also Goings choking.

They made a big play on defense with the King INT, and capitalized.

They moved the hell out of the ball in the first half, but no big plays, and only got 3 points out of it.

 

Are you actually smack talking after a loss?