Dan Henning

he didn't.

Neither did David Carr, for anyone scoring at home.

I agree those decisions have hurt. I'm not happy with our offense either. I just think the whole "let's look back in fondness on the 24th ranked offense of last year" makes no sense. If we hired the wrong guy, then we did. Doesn't mean we fired the wrong guy.

 

I know you disagreed, but it would have been nice if you had explained what Henning's problems were, produced any evidence to support them, or showed any kind of acknowledgment for the counter-evidence that I produced.

 

What I did, you either outright dismissed or ignored.

 

Maybe you think so because you only imagined it? Feel free to point out anywhere that you actually produced any evidence whatsoever.

 

How much of that 24th ranked offense was on Fox? Henning was the scapegoat plain and simple.

 

Then fire him, if that's the problem. Still, the problem was there, and it's still there. This ideal that there were no problems under Henning?

Maybe if you cared more about the actual point, and less about the issues driving this, you would've caught them in the last two, three threads we discussed this.

 

I guess it's easier to keep pretending that I missed them instead of just giving me a link to any of this supposed evidence.

 

The Panthers only run about one screen play a year, always have.

 

They tried to run 4 or 5 today.

 

Just look at the last thread you skipped out on. Of course, in each instance, you said "down and distance didn't change, so Jake = the entire problem", without showing any work, and then expected me to dissect every play to disprove it. I gave numerous things, for and against Jake, the offense, the personnel, and you ignored what you didn't dismiss.