The "Stop Bitching About David Carr" Thread

I'm biased against Joe Montana too, right?? The argument is that we would have magically been better with our regular QB. So actually pointing out that neither the franchise guy, the guy who played, or one of the greatest QB's of all time wouldn't have fared better isn't bias. Learn basics of debate.....

Comparing someone to the standing franchise QB is what you compare anything else to...it's not bias. BUT anytime anything is said that may potentially cast Jake in a light that insinuates he's less than perfect always brings out the homers. Way to step up!

 

So you believe Jake could have overcome today's poor O-line play?? Why couldn't he do it last year when all you guys were blaming the o-line for his failures?? It's a fair question.

 

I'm not a Jake homer you retard. You are just being stupid in saying that having our starting QB wouldn't have made any difference. Anytime anyone brings up anything that insinuates that Delhomme might be somewhat competent you freak out.

Even Haynesworth said they knew they could get to Carr the way he held the ball.

 

did you see all the gift that the Titans give us and what we did with them Nothing.Listen even in 05 Our Running game was not so good.Yet We score more then we are right now.Carr is not the Answer .Now it show how much we are paying a big time price for signing him to backup Jake.We Carr starting for us we might as well start thinking about Who will be Bill cower Coaching staff next year and start looking at the draft

 

I disagree.

We're the only team that has played 4 different QB's this year. 75% of our games have ended with a different quarterback than the one that started the game.

Maybe it's not problem 1, but it's safely in the top-5.

 

What you don't seem to realize is that every O-line Carr lines up behind looks bad. Think about it...Vinny, as slow as he is, never hit the ground in the first half of the Colts game. Our O-line actually blocked their D-line better than the Pats did tonight until the second half when Carr came in the game. That's not to say that we definitely would have won with Jake in the game, but I believe that we would have had a much better chance with him or Vinny.


To be honest with you, I believe Carr is either telegraphing whether the play is run or pass, or he isn't changing up the snap count enough, because the opponents D-line looks quicker off the ball everytime he is in there.

 

I disagree. If our quarterbacks were turning the ball over consistently or wildly inaccurate I would agree, but that isn't the case. The biggest problem we've had in terms of our QBs is that they haven't made a lot of big plays. That is an issue, especially for an offense that had come to rely on them from Jake, but it's not crippling.

 

IMO, QB is the biggest problem by far. I guarantee you that neither the Colts or the Patriots would be nearly as good right now if they had to go through what the Panthers are going through.

 

To be correct, I also said having Joe Montana wouldn't have made any difference, fuckhead. If our o-line gets man-handled like they did today.....we lose regardless.