1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Dan Henning

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by meatpile, Nov 4, 2007.

Page 1 of 6
  1. Nov 4, 2007 at 3:24 PM #1
    meatpile

    meatpile 7-9

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    35,132
    Likes Received:
    138
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    All up in Boo's mama
    I'm betting he's laughing.
     
  2. Nov 4, 2007 at 3:25 PM #2
    John Fox

    John Fox It Is What It Is

    Posts:
    1,670
    Likes Received:
    59
    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Location:
    Charlotte
    How good was Henning without an efficient Qb, though?
     
  3. Nov 4, 2007 at 3:26 PM #3
    chipshotx

    chipshotx Full Access Member

    Posts:
    13,048
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    Location:
    Gondwanaland
    wasn't that good with one either

    he only looked good when they could run with Davis and line was on steroids
     
  4. Nov 4, 2007 at 3:28 PM #4
    meatpile

    meatpile 7-9

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    35,132
    Likes Received:
    138
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    All up in Boo's mama
    He looked better than the panthers have for the past 6 quarters.
     
  5. Nov 4, 2007 at 3:29 PM #5
    John Fox

    John Fox It Is What It Is

    Posts:
    1,670
    Likes Received:
    59
    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Location:
    Charlotte
    We won without much of a running game in '05, but that was Smith's breakout year. Now we're not even getting him the ball. Some of that falls on Davidson. I'm betting that most of it falls on the QB.
     
  6. Nov 4, 2007 at 3:36 PM #6
    chipshotx

    chipshotx Full Access Member

    Posts:
    13,048
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    Location:
    Gondwanaland
    4 of those were with Carr...the first quater of those 6 was the 11 minute drive for a TD...can't complain about that
     
  7. Nov 4, 2007 at 3:37 PM #7
    stratocatter

    stratocatter Full Access Member

    Posts:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Fuck that, Carr doesn't look good but who would behind that OL vs that DL?
     
  8. Nov 4, 2007 at 4:41 PM #8
    lde

    lde Teddy and Gabriel

    Posts:
    4,109
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Location:
    Hillsborough, NC
    I bet he is too. I had problems with Henning as an OC, but at least he was an OC. This is the 2nd game the announcers have said the plays don't seem to have any kind of plan behind them. It may be more. I was at 2 of the games, and never watched by recording.

    Note, the solution was not to keep Henning, I don't think. It was to get a legit OC who was better.
     
  9. Nov 4, 2007 at 4:42 PM #9
    Jaz

    Jaz Full Access Member

    Posts:
    1,794
    Likes Received:
    5
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Location:
    NOLA
    What the fuck happened to the screen play? We were talking big, and how we installed a new screen everyday in practice during training camp. You'd think when the team is blitzing the shit out of you, it'd be effective. Although I am forgetting we are the worst screen team in the history of football
     
  10. Nov 4, 2007 at 4:59 PM #10
    magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    He looked better than this with a good QB, and he looked this bad last year with a good QB that was getting him a lot more yardage than this.
    He looked about this bad with the other QBs. I can't fault Davidson for Carr being this gunshy. Davidson's had his issues too, but we made plays passing with Jake.
     
Page 1 of 6

Share This Page