1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Cavs/Pistons

Discussion in 'Charlotte Hornets' started by kshead, Jun 1, 2007.

Page 4 of 4
  1. Jun 3, 2007 at 4:44 PM #31
    VA49er

    VA49er Full Access Member

    Posts:
    22,561
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2003
    I thought he somehow acquired it based on the money he was about to make. It's a gray area and I'm sure he's not the first to benefit.
     
  2. Jun 3, 2007 at 10:31 PM #32
    Clay

    Clay Full Access Member

    Age:
    44
    Posts:
    5,997
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Funniest typo ever.
     
  3. Jun 4, 2007 at 8:51 AM #33
    Trace

    Trace Full Access Member

    Age:
    58
    Posts:
    27,046
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Location:
    Nashville
    Thanks! lol

    Just reread this.


    GO CAVS.
     
  4. Jun 4, 2007 at 1:33 PM #34
    sockittome16

    sockittome16 Full Access Member

    Posts:
    3,080
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2003
    is it just me or do you get a technical for everything in the NBA now. They've gone a little to PC. McDyess should have never been out of that game.
     
  5. Jun 4, 2007 at 2:42 PM #35
    Superfluous_Nut

    Superfluous_Nut pastor of muppets

    Posts:
    33,934
    Likes Received:
    559
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    los angeles
    flagrant 2 is automatic ejection. if clotheslining a guy going to the basket and sending him to the floor isn't a flagrant 2, i dunno what is.
     
  6. Jun 5, 2007 at 9:43 AM #36
    Clay

    Clay Full Access Member

    Age:
    44
    Posts:
    5,997
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Nah that was a hard foul. Maybe a flagrant. It didn't look like he was trying to hurt him.
     
  7. Jun 7, 2007 at 11:48 AM #37
    kickazzz2000

    kickazzz2000 CURRENTLY ON THE CAN

    Age:
    47
    Posts:
    3,563
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2003
    Location:
    Doylestown, PA
    looked like a flagrant 1 to me
     
  8. Jun 7, 2007 at 2:35 PM #38
    Superfluous_Nut

    Superfluous_Nut pastor of muppets

    Posts:
    33,934
    Likes Received:
    559
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    los angeles
    intent isn't an issue. you've got:

    flagrant 1 - unnecessary contact.
    flagrant 2 - unnecessary and excessive contact.

    sending a guy to the ground by clipping his head as he's going up for a layup should be considered excessive contact.

    if there was any question about it, lebron's reaction helped seal the deal. these teams have a bit of a history and the refs aren't going to let the game get out of control.
     
Page 4 of 4

Share This Page