Big East

yes, he has

Sagarin Rating
1 ATLANTIC COAST = 84.27 84.11 ( 1) 12
2 PACIFIC-10 = 83.21 82.53 ( 3) 10
3 SOUTHEASTERN = 82.85 83.03 ( 2) 12
4 BIG TEN = 81.92 81.80 ( 4) 11
5 BIG 12 = 81.68 81.28 ( 5) 12
6 MISSOURI VALLEY = 81.09 81.01 ( 6) 10
7 BIG EAST = 81.08 80.75 ( 7) 16
8 MOUNTAIN WEST = 78.30 78.53 ( 8) 9
9 WESTERN ATHLETIC = 75.34 74.66 ( 10) 9
10 CONFERENCE USA = 74.99 74.82 ( 9) 12

 

The original argument was that the Big East sucks, which it does. Has nothing to do with the ACC. Then he comes out with the big 8-5 shit, then hangs his hat on 2 games that a sucky State team lost. Yeah, fuckova lot better.

 

:newsmile29: : grid

 

yep the Big East sucks at Sagarin. it's their own fault for having 16 teams in their league, because the bottom four are obviously skewing the numbers.

aside from the domination Big East teams have shown against ACC teams this year (obviously, Math, the Marquette win over Duke is way more impressive than any wins over a D2-quality State team), and there are the three ranked teams (compared to four for the ACC). Four, maybe five Big East teams will make the tournament.

Obviously, the Big East doesn't suck.

except at Sagarin.

 

The Big East sucks because I say so.

 

I stand corrected

 

So you had one big win over a dook team that isn't that good this year? Let's not forget about those State and Wake wins.

Woot, that's something to get excited over.

You pointed out one thing, I just happened to bring several facts into the equation and you get all upset over it.

Overall the ACC is better than the Big Dump, that has been proven, sure the Big East has an 8-5 record against the ACC. Yayyyyy! I am glad that one little token gives you something to cheer about.

 

what you are supposed to "prove," at least in this thread, is that the Big East sucks. Instead, you've only proven yourself to be a clueless moron. why did you do that...again?

 

don't do it Fever

 

c'mon, put down the computer