1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Anybody see this si.com thing about the draft?

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by mathmajors, Dec 11, 2006.

  1. Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Wiggins blows ass, though, seriously. If we threw to Mangum that often he'd have the same numbers or better and would be a much better blocker as well.

    As for the draft, like I said, the college regular season just ended so this is the perfect time to discuss things that we or someone else saw during that period. We discuss it this time every year regardless of our record, just as you bitch about us discussing it this time every year.
     
  2. magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    he doesn't blow ass. He's a player that we could've utilized better, which is all I'm concerned with. Whether it be someone on the roster or not.

    You certainly know very well what I'm talking about, and I'm not the only one that watches year after year while people who don't actually care about the draft use it to pout about the current year.
     
  3. Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Yes, he really does. Talk to some Minnesota fans and see if they're impressed with him. He served as a dump-off option, which Mangum could do just as well if we used him that way, and Wiggins' blocking was so bad that he has been repeatedly benched. He sucks ass.
    I know that in multiple threads where people are attempting to intelligently discuss the draft you've done in and bitched that people are actually talking about it, just as you're now apparently outlawing discussion of other NFL teams. Heil magnus!
     
  4. CelticCat

    CelticCat ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED

    Posts:
    3,964
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    You dont still stand by that do you? I myself had doubts about his arm strength but ive said here before he showed more then enough early on in his NFL career.

    But honeslty, you shouldnt take every comment so damn seriously, hell i slammed myself in that post. Everyone knows you were down on Rivers, why dont you just admit your surprised he's doing better than expected and leave it at that.

    Your not actually bragging about Grossman are you, jeez man, let it go.
    You were wrong on Rivers, i was just pointing it out for shits and giggles. Impeccable? a bit of an overstatement, no?. I recall you saying he was 3rd or 4th rounder, thats a tad off. But its just an opinion based on your personal observation so dont waste time trying to defend it, its all in fun really. Hell, i was all about Andrew Walter, i still believe he'd prosper if he wasnt stuck on such a shitty team.
     
  5. Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    This is why I don't like discussing things with you, because you have such extreme reading comprehension issues that I inevitably end up repeating myself endlessly. I already asked you to watch a San Diego game closely and to observe how Rivers has to throw his body into deep passes whereas most quarterbacks generate that force simply through arm action.
    I'm not surprised, though. Why don't you admit that you were wrong when you claimed that I said he was a complete waste? You said it and I provided proof that you were wrong, but you won't admit it. Rivers is what I described in the magazine three years ago, a guy who makes good decisions and has good touch but has major arm strength issues. He's solid, but not great.
    You claimed that I was wrong because you have spent years now criticizing me out of bitterness over me proving you wrong numerous times. Unfortunately for you, I just provided evidence that your claim about my opinion of Rivers was completely wrong too.
    Not at all. If you had paid any attention you would have noted that my record on projecting college QBs is exceptional. Remember Boller? I'm not great at projecting RBs by any means, but when it comes to QBs, I'm the best.
     
  6. magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    which was the point to begin with.
     
  7. magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    that's basically what I'll do and have done. He's been decent. I don't believe he is as talented as Manning or Roethlisberger, though.
     
  8. Shrapnel

    Shrapnel Stinky

    Age:
    63
    Posts:
    13,934
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Location:
    East Bugtussel
    :usa:
     
  9. Fred Smoot's Father

    Fred Smoot's Father the future is bright

    Posts:
    1,031
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    :dancing_dick:
     
  10. Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    And I'm fine with the suggestion that we should be getting more out of Mangum. My point, however, was that Wiggins sucks donkey balls. He's a terrible blocker and there's nothing special about him as a receiver either. His numbers are just a product of him being force-fed the ball.
     

Share This Page