Delhomme

the roller on my mouse was just as good as a pgdwn...I ain't reading all that.

Collin says 1 thing, Mags disagrees and defends his position....and the cycle continues.

Is this about right?

 

it usually starts with me saying something, then Collin's outrage (fake for an attempt to exaggerate, or real? who knows), then back and forth.

As of yet, nobody else has suggested I wanted us to lose because of Weinke, or wanted him to do poorly, other than him. Maybe Hammer will, now, but that certainly doesn't make it hold water any better than Collin's 'proof'.

 

I bet Magnus gets the last word.

Just a hunch.

 

I left to watch the cowfags get their asses rolled over and a defensive personal petty ego exhibition broke out up in here . . . gee what a surprise

Maybe Cliff notes versions should be provided with each one of these monolithic pissyfests . . . Who the hell is going to take the time to read all of this crap?

 

who is right?

 

I know what I meant when I said things than what he wants to make them out to be.

In general, what you're getting at is that the arguing doesn't solve anything, and I agree. Never stopped any of us.

 

Wow...this coming from the same guy who told me what I meant, and called it "arguing minutiae" when I laid out what I actually said??? You are a hypocrit.


And for the record....I said you were just dying for weinke to suck....waaaaaaaaaay back in the first half.

 

honestly.....

Weinke can't help it.....

he does stink...

that's why he holds the clipboard

 

And it wasn't true then, either. Nobody wanted Weinke to do poorly.

It was arguing minutae then, and it is now. You deciding you knew what Delhomme was back before 03 - and seeing him go through everything he has and still having the same opinion of him? That's not logical.

 

Never said anything about before 03.....I said when he came here...his first season.